Top Posts
The Best Way to Expand Naloxone Access? Clear...
Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit,...
Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion
Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve...
SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But...
Federal Versus State Policies
WeightWatchers pivots from diets to drugs in UK...
Pink Storage expands into Nottingham with £1.5m investment...
Clarity sought on ‘green’ energy project economics
RoW, 99-year lease bills named PHL legislative priorities
  • Home
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • World News
  • Editor’s Pick
Money Assets Saver
Editor's PickInvesting

Federal Versus State Policies

by May 22, 2025
May 22, 2025

Jeffrey Miron

What level of government—state or federal—should set economic and social policy?

The modern presumption is that “good” policies should be implemented federally. That is the logic behind the federal role in setting a minimum wage, providing Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, imposing nationwide environmental regulations, and much more. If something “works,” so the thinking goes, why not apply it everywhere?

Yet there are reasons to prefer state-level control (if any), even if that sometimes produces less-than-ideal outcomes.

For starters, most policies involve a mix of positive and negative effects. And people differ on not only what is “good” but how to balance costs and benefits. A federal mandate forces national uniformity on divisive issues, such as abortion or school curricula. Letting states choose leaves room for calmer disagreement and lower polarization.

Further, government policies and programs tend to grow, especially those at the federal level, but state variation serves as a check. Critics worry about a “race to the bottom,” where states gut regulation to attract business or skimp on redistribution to avoid being a “welfare magnet.” But this tendency, to the extent it occurs, is a useful counterweight to the excessive expansion that is likely to occur when policies are made at the federal level. Plus, in practice, states often go beyond federal standards: Think of California’s aggressive emissions rules or Massachusetts’ expansion of Medicaid before the Affordable Care Act.

To be sure, state-level control has downsides. Some states may do too little—for example, they might underinvest in public health. And state-level variation means national companies face a patchwork of laws and regulations, which raises costs.

But these negatives are plausibly worth accepting to avoid one-size-fits-all federal policies. In particular, federalism likely works best when applied consistently across all policies, whether politically left or right.

This article appeared on Substack on May 22, 2025. Lucy Patalano, a student at Wellesley College, cowrote this post.

previous post
WeightWatchers pivots from diets to drugs in UK partnership with anti-obesity treatment provider CheqUp
next post
SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

You may also like

The Best Way to Expand Naloxone Access? Clear...

May 22, 2025

Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit,...

May 22, 2025

Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

May 22, 2025

Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve...

May 22, 2025

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But...

May 22, 2025

Clarity sought on ‘green’ energy project economics

May 22, 2025

RoW, 99-year lease bills named PHL legislative priorities

May 22, 2025

NAIA passenger volume tops 13 million in Q1

May 22, 2025

Hog production down 3.7% in Q1

May 22, 2025

PHL cannot remain ‘passive’ as tariffs roil trade

May 22, 2025

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • The Best Way to Expand Naloxone Access? Clear the Path

      May 22, 2025
    • Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Not Expand It

      May 22, 2025
    • Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

      May 22, 2025
    • Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve the House Tax Bill

      May 22, 2025
    • SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

      May 22, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 moneyassetssaver.com | All Rights Reserved

    Money Assets Saver
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • World News
    • Editor’s Pick